[elrepo-devel] Announcement: Updated kmod-atl1e testing release (Version 1.0.0.11)

[Phil Perry]

Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 11 April 2010 12:33, Phil Perry <phil at elrepo.org> wrote:
>> Alan Bartlett wrote:
>>> On 10 April 2010 17:08, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote:
>>>> On 10 April 2010 17:00, Phil Perry <phil at elrepo.org> wrote:
>>>>> Would this be a case that might warrant use of an epoch?
>>>> Yes, I thought long and hard about it, but decided against using one.  ;-)
>>> My response, above, does not deny any interested parties in attempting
>>> to twist my arm / tweak the black cat's tail to prompt me to change my
>>> mind . . .
>>>
>>> If we were to use an epoch, should it be 0 or 1?
>>>
>> It should be 1, I believe.
>>
>> Epoch: 1
> 
> My only recall of seeing an epoch in use is with CentOS and I'm sure
> that what I saw was a zero epoch number -- 0:whatever . . .
> 

I'm not sure either, so I just tried:

yum list \* | grep '0\:' and yum list \* | grep '1\:'

which leads me to believe we should start at 1.

/OT - SUN's JDK is interesting :D
jdk.x86_64                                 2000:1.6.0_19-fcs