[elrepo] Kernel panic using recent kernels
Miguel Alvarez
miguellvrz9 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 2 18:20:46 EST 2011
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Miguel Alvarez <miguellvrz9 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote:
>> On 2 March 2011 21:38, Miguel Alvarez <miguellvrz9 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there an archive of the older kernel-ml RPMs available? I could
>>> have sworn an older version of kernel-ml worked on my G6 but of course
>>> I can't remember which version it was.
>>>
>>> But I agree, very strange indeed but I can verify I'm seeing the same
>>> behavior on both my G6 and G7. There's nothing special about the fs
>>> layout -- I always just accept the recommended default configs during
>>> the install process:
>>>
>>> ---/etc/fstab---
>>> /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1
>>> LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
>>> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
>>> devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
>>> sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
>>> proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
>>> /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap defaults 0 0
>>>
>>> ---fdisk -l ---
>>> Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 146.7 GB, 146778685440 bytes
>>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17844 cylinders
>>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>>>
>>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>>> /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
>>> /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 14 17844 143227507+ 8e Linux LVM
>>>
>>> I'll keep working on things on my end, but if you could point me to
>>> the archive (presuming there is one), that would be greatly
>>> appreciated.
>>
>> Hi Miguel,
>>
>> We don't keep an archive of the previous kernel packages. Once the
>> latest stable tarball is released by the LKA, new kernels are built,
>> signed, uploaded and the previous packages are committed to the
>> universal null device.
>>
>> However we do have two kernel-ml series available. The first is the
>> 2.6.37-*.el5.elrepo series that users of yum will obtain. (Eventually
>> that will be replaced by the 2.6.38-*.el5.elrepo series, once
>> linux-2.6.38 has been declared stable.) The other kernel-ml series is
>> based on the long-term support linux-2.6.35 tarball. This is currently
>> 2.6.35-11.el5.elrepo and that is what I am using on this workstation.
>> I find that the 2.6.37 series is just too new for this "antique"
>> hardware. (11.5 years old!)
>>
>> [quote]
>> [ajb at GX1 ~]$ uname -r
>> 2.6.35-11.el5.elrepo
>> [/quote]
>>
>> Perhaps you would care to try that version?
>
> My thoughts exactly. I'll give that a go and let you know how it goes!
2.6.35-11 does work. I'll take its kernel config and try rebuilding
2.6.37 with it and see what happens.
Thanks!
More information about the elrepo
mailing list