[elrepo] nvidia-detect feature enhancement
Pat Riehecky
riehecky at fnal.gov
Fri Feb 13 12:50:07 EST 2015
On 02/13/2015 11:44 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
> On 13/02/15 17:27, Phil Perry wrote:
>> On 13/02/15 16:40, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>> My memory says typically $() and `` don't capture STDERR.
>>>
>>> Quick tests seem to support that:
>>>
>>> yum install `echo thing >&2`
>>> yum install $(echo thing >&2)
>>>
>>> (also, pull request sent for errors to STDERR, but you should probably
>>> double check it)
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>> Hi Pat,
>>
>> Indeed, that seems to be the case (learn something new every day!)
>>
>> At which point we could write all the verbose output to stderr and still
>> have it written to the console by default, with only the package name
>> written to stdout, and
>>
>> # yum install $(nvidia-detect)
>>
>> would only parse the package name as desired.
>>
>> So at which point do we still need a terse option given that
>> nvidia-detect 2> /dev/null would achieve the same result?
>>
>>
> Answering my own question, I think having verbose (-v) or terse (-t) is
> a good idea as at some point I'm bound to forget and add a plain printf
> statement thus breaking the intended use case.
>
> Having clearly defined behaviour rather than (ab)using stderr and the
> fact it is not captured by $() seems sensible to me.
>
> So my proposal would be:
>
> Default output of just the package name:
>
> $ nvidia-detect
> kmod-nvidia-304xx
>
> Verbose output (-v, --verbose) written to stdout and similar to the
> present output:
>
> $ nvidia-detect -v
> Probing for supported NVIDIA devices...
> [10de:0392] NVIDIA Corporation G73 [GeForce 7600 GS]
> This device requires the legacy 304.xx NVIDIA driver kmod-nvidia-304xx
>
>
> All errors and warning messages written to stderr.
>
Sounds good to me
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
More information about the elrepo
mailing list