[elrepo] What is the chance of an el7 e1000 driver?

Nick Howitt nick at howitts.co.uk
Thu Jun 2 15:53:50 EDT 2016



On 02/06/2016 20:10, Phil Perry wrote:
>
> On 02/06/16 18:26, Nick Howitt wrote:
>> Hi Akemi,
>>
>> Have you been able to make any progress with this or is it a lost cause?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nick
>>
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Unfortunately at this point I'd say it's looking like a lost cause - 
> far too many errors for me to wade my way through trying to fix:
>
> Building target platforms: x86_64
> Building for target x86_64
> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.c5jstt
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + cd /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + rm -rf e1000-8.0.35
> + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/phil/rpmbuild/SOURCES/e1000-8.0.35.tar.gz
> + /usr/bin/tar -xf -
> + STATUS=0
> + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
> + cd e1000-8.0.35
> + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
> + /usr/bin/chmod a-x e1000.7 README
> + /usr/bin/gzip e1000.7
> + /usr/bin/cp /home/phil/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ELRepo-e1000-8.0.35-Makefile 
> src/Makefile
> + echo 'override e1000 * weak-updates/e1000'
> + exit 0
> Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.V2K4Gs
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + cd e1000-8.0.35
> + pushd src
> ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35
> + /usr/bin/make KSRC=/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64
> /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 
> SUBDIRS=/home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src modules
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64'
>   CC [M]  /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.o
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:134:23: error: 
> expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'e1000_remove'
>  static void __devexit e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>                        ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:253:2: error: 
> implicit declaration of function '__devexit_p' 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   .remove   = __devexit_p(e1000_remove),
>   ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:253:26: error: 
> 'e1000_remove' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .remove   = __devexit_p(e1000_remove),
>                           ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:695:2: error: 
> unknown field 'ndo_set_multicast_list' specified in initializer
>   .ndo_set_multicast_list = e1000_set_multi,
>   ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:695:2: 
> warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by 
> default]
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:695:2: 
> warning: (near initialization for 
> 'e1000_netdev_ops.ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid') [enabled by default]
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:702:2: error: 
> unknown field 'ndo_vlan_rx_register' specified in initializer
>   .ndo_vlan_rx_register = e1000_vlan_rx_register,
>   ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:702:26: error: 
> 'e1000_vlan_rx_register' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .ndo_vlan_rx_register = e1000_vlan_rx_register,
>                           ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:703:25: error: 
> 'e1000_vlan_rx_add_vid' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid = e1000_vlan_rx_add_vid,
>                          ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:704:26: error: 
> 'e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid = e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid,
>                           ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:722:22: error: 
> expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'e1000_probe'
>  static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>                       ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:1093:23: 
> error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 
> 'e1000_remove'
>  static void __devexit e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>                        ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:1141:22: 
> error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 
> 'e1000_sw_init'
>  static int __devinit e1000_sw_init(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>                       ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:1192:22: 
> error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 
> 'e1000_alloc_rings'
>  static int __devinit e1000_alloc_rings(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>                       ^
> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
>                  from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
>                  from 
> /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64/include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
>                  from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
>                  from include/linux/types.h:5,
>                  from include/linux/list.h:4,
>                  from include/linux/module.h:9,
>                  from 
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:29:
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c: In function 
> 'e1000_tx_map':
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:52:52: error: invalid operands to 
> binary - (have 'struct <anonymous>' and 'struct page *')
>  #define __page_to_pfn(page) (unsigned long)((page) - vmemmap)
>                                                     ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:153:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
>  # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>                                           ^
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:72:21: note: in expansion of macro 
> '__page_to_pfn'
>  #define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
>                      ^
> /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:137:44: 
> note: in expansion of macro 'page_to_pfn'
>  #define page_to_phys(page)    ((dma_addr_t)page_to_pfn(page) << 
> PAGE_SHIFT)
>                                             ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2789:26: note: 
> in expansion of macro 'page_to_phys'
>         !((unsigned long)(page_to_phys(frag->page) + offset
>                           ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2801:11: 
> error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'dma_map_page'
>            DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>            ^
> In file included from 
> /usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h:44:0,
>                  from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:82,
>                  from include/linux/skbuff.h:33,
>                  from include/linux/if_ether.h:23,
>                  from include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h:17,
>                  from include/linux/ethtool.h:16,
>                  from include/linux/netdevice.h:42,
>                  from 
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:34:
> include/asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h:71:26: note: expected 'struct 
> page *' but argument is of type 'struct <anonymous>'
>  static inline dma_addr_t dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page 
> *page,
>                           ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c: In function 
> 'e1000_receive_skb':
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3731:2: 
> warning: passing argument 1 of 'napi_gro_receive' from incompatible 
> pointer type [enabled by default]
>   napi_gro_receive(skb);
>   ^
> In file included from 
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:34:0:
> include/linux/netdevice.h:2753:14: note: expected 'struct napi_struct 
> *' but argument is of type 'struct sk_buff *'
>  gro_result_t napi_gro_receive(struct napi_struct *napi, struct 
> sk_buff *skb);
>               ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3731:2: error: 
> too few arguments to function 'napi_gro_receive'
>   napi_gro_receive(skb);
>   ^
> In file included from 
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:34:0:
> include/linux/netdevice.h:2753:14: note: declared here
>  gro_result_t napi_gro_receive(struct napi_struct *napi, struct 
> sk_buff *skb);
>               ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c: In function 
> 'e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq':
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3883:25: 
> error: 'KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
>                          KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
>                          ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3883:25: note: 
> each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it 
> appears in
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3883:25: 
> error: too many arguments to function 'kmap_atomic'
> In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:10:0,
>                  from 
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:33:
> include/linux/highmem.h:66:21: note: declared here
>  static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page)
>                      ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3886:39: 
> error: macro "kunmap_atomic" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1
>                     KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
>                                        ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3885:6: error: 
> 'kunmap_atomic' undeclared (first use in this function)
>       kunmap_atomic(vaddr,
>       ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c: At top level:
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:133:12: 
> warning: 'e1000_probe' used but never defined [enabled by default]
>  static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
> pci_device_id *ent);
>             ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:135:12: 
> warning: 'e1000_alloc_rings' declared 'static' but never defined 
> [-Wunused-function]
>  static int e1000_alloc_rings(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
>             ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:136:12: 
> warning: 'e1000_sw_init' declared 'static' but never defined 
> [-Wunused-function]
>  static int e1000_sw_init(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
>             ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2136:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_update_phy_info' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_update_phy_info(unsigned long data)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2142:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_update_phy_info_task' defined but not used 
> [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_update_phy_info_task(struct work_struct *work)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2252:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_watchdog' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_watchdog(unsigned long data)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2260:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_watchdog_task' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2156:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_82547_tx_fifo_stall' defined but not used 
> [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_82547_tx_fifo_stall(unsigned long data)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:2166:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_82547_tx_fifo_stall_task' defined but not used 
> [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_82547_tx_fifo_stall_task(struct work_struct *work)
>              ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3509:12: 
> warning: 'e1000_poll' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int e1000_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>             ^
> /home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.c:3128:13: 
> warning: 'e1000_reset_task' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static void e1000_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
>              ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [/home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src/e1000_main.o] 
> Error 1
> make[1]: *** [_module_/home/phil/rpmbuild/BUILD/e1000-8.0.35/src] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64'
> make: *** [default] Error 2
>
> _______________________________________________
> elrepo mailing list
> elrepo at lists.elrepo.org
> http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
Hi,

Thanks anyway for looking. Fortunately it was not for me, just for 
someone on a forum I help on.

Nick


More information about the elrepo mailing list