[elrepo] Centos 7.6 nvidia issue

[Phil Perry]

On 05/12/2018 22:27, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/5/18 5:03 PM, Phil Perry wrote:
>> ...
>> Please could you show 'rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libGL.so' and 'll 
>> /usr/lib64/libGL.so' - is it symlinking to the nvidia LibGL.so 
>> library? As you're still using the old nvidia packages, it should 
>> symlink to /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1
>>
> [lowen at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libGL.so
> libglvnd-devel-1.0.1-0.8.git5baa1e5.el7.x86_64
> [lowen at localhost ~]$ ll /usr/lib64/libGL.so
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Nov 22 00:48 /usr/lib64/libGL.so -> 
> libGL.so.1.7.0
> [lowen at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libGL.so.1.7.0
> libglvnd-glx-1.0.1-0.8.git5baa1e5.el7.x86_64
> [lowen at localhost ~]$
> 

I suspect the issue is it's linking the version in /usr/lib64/ provided 
by libglvnd-glx rather than the version in /usr/lib64/nvidia/

The updated nvidia packages should fix the issue, I hope.

> The system is updated to CR, not to the 'official' 7.6 as yet.
> 
>> But before we get too deep into this - does updating the nvidia 
>> packages fix the issue? If yum still isn't finding them, can you 
>> download and manually update?
> 
> I'll see if the yum metadata catches up, and if it doesn't soon I'll 
> download and install manually.
> 
> 
>>
>> I found this bug, maybe related:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440124
> Yeah, I found that one, too.  I figured at the time that I was just a 
> bit ahead of the curve going with CR, so I'd just wait until things 
> settled out a bit before digging too deep.  But then when I saw that the 
> packages had been split, but a yum list here wasn't showing it.... 
> Anyway, let's see what the next day or so brings as far as updates go.
>