[elrepo] BTRFS for RHEL 8

[Akemi Yagi]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:15 AM Joseph Christopher Sible
<jcsible at cert.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 15:01 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:39 PM Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:36 PM Joseph Christopher Sible
> > > <jcsible at cert.org> wrote:
> > > > I'm okay with using kernel-ml. However, doesn't that only remove
> > > > the need for
> > > > kmod-btrfs? Don't I still need btrfs-progs to practically use the
> > > > filesystem?
> > > >
> > > > Joseph C. Sible
> > >
> > > Yes. I can put what was in the testing repo back in there so you
> > > can
> > > give it a try.
> > >
> > > Akemi
> >
> > The following packages have been released to the testing repo and
> > will
> > be syncing to our mirrors:
> >
> > btrfs-progs-4.20.2-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > btrfs-progs-devel-4.20.2-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > libbtrfs-4.20.2-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > libbtrfsutil-4.20.2-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > zstd-1.3.4-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > libzstd-1.3.4-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> > libzstd-devel-1.3.4-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > Akemi
>
> I've now been using these for several weeks, and no issues are
> apparent. Are they ready to be promoted out of testing?
>
> Joseph C. Sible

Based on your positive results, we could move them to the main
repository. Some of them, as Trevor pointed out, are in EPEL and they
have a newer version. We may need to update them. Or let EPEL maintain
those packages.

Akemi