[elrepo] kernel-lt and microcode updates
Phil Perry
phil at elrepo.org
Fri Jun 19 04:31:17 EDT 2020
On 19/06/2020 01:45, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:33 AM Orion Poplawski <orion at nwra.com
> <mailto:orion at nwra.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello -
>
> I was poking around and noticed some differences in microcode output
> in dmesg
> between the stock EL7 kernel and kernel-lt:
>
> dmesg-3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64:
> [ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xd6,
> date =
> 2019-10-03
> [ 5.997673] microcode: sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xd6
> [ 5.998518] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.01
> <tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk <mailto:tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>>,
> Peter Oruba
> [ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xd6,
> date =
> 2019-10-03
> [ 6.035419] microcode: sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xd6
> [ 6.035503] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.01
> <tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk <mailto:tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>>,
> Peter Oruba
> [ 25.411983] microcode: updated to revision 0xdc, date = 2020-04-27
>
> dmesg-4.4.227-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64:
> [ 0.052043] SRBDS: Vulnerable: No microcode
> [ 0.052066] MDS: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no
> microcode
> [ 1.807176] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xc6
> [ 1.807189] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xc6
> [ 1.807210] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xc6
> [ 1.807230] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x406e3, pf=0x80, revision=0xc6
> [ 1.807312] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.01
> <tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk <mailto:tigran at aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>>,
> Peter Oruba
>
> This leads me to believe that the microcode is not getting updated
> when using
> the elrepo lt kernel. Is that expected?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orion
>
>
> Looks like the explanation is in the posttrans scriptlet of microcode_ctl.
>
> rpm -q --scripts microcode_ctl
>
> [quote]
> ...
> # For RPM selection, kernel flavours (like "debug" or "kdump" or "zfcp",
> # with only the former being relevant to x86 architecture) are a part or RPM
> # name; it's also a part of uname, with different separator used in RHEL 6/7
> # and RHEL 8. RT kernel, however, is special, as "rt" is another part
> # of RPM name and it has its own versioning scheme both in NVR and uname.
> # And there's the kernel package split in RHEL 8, so one should look for
> *-core
> # and not the main package.
> pkgs="kernel kernel-debug kernel-rt kernel-rt-debug"
> ...
> [/quote]
>
> Therefore, initramfs will not be regenerated for kernel-ml or kernel-lt.
>
> By the way, the microcode file name as shown by the lsinitrd command is:
>
> kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin (Intel)
>
> or
>
> kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin (AMD)
>
> Akemi
>
We can probably fix this by adding a %triggerin script to kernel-ml and
kernel-lt packages to achieve the same thing.
%triggerin -- microcode_ctl
<script to update initramfs for elrepo kernels only>
More information about the elrepo
mailing list