<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 02/03/2012 12:24 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:alpine.LRH.2.02.1202031722140.18819@pfcpm187.yrrqf.np.hx"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Alan Bartlett wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It has recently been suggested to me that the ELRepo Project should
now provide a kernel-ml package set based on the long-term support
linux-3.0.x series rather than the linux-2.6.39.y series.
Having mulled it over for a while, it does make sense to me and so I
have "smiled" at that suggestion. Before I go ahead and implement it,
which will eventually result in the deprecation of the
kernel-ml-2.6.39-4.2.el6.elrepo package set, I would like to hear
opinions / comments from the ELRepo user-base.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Sounds like solid logic to me.
jh
_______________________________________________
elrepo mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:elrepo@lists.elrepo.org">elrepo@lists.elrepo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo">http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="sans-serif">It would be nice if you could leave
2.6.39-4.2 set there in case someone wanted to use<br>
the specfile to build an updated version.<br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Director of Technology<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>