[elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

[Phil Perry]

On 10/10/12 23:30, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>
> I'd suggest kernel30 rather than kernel-lt since the long term in this
> case is not that long and soon we'll be trying to work out how to change
> kernel-lt-3.0-x to kernel-lt-3.8.x or whatever the next LTS kernel
> happens to be.
>

Unless the desired action is to update to the latest LTS kernel at that 
point? At which time a user can add an exclude for kernel-lt if they 
want to stay at an unsupported 3.0.y.

But I take your point. What do others think?