[elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

[Trevor Hemsley]

On 10/10/12 23:23, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 12:57 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>> So let's try to move this on. As it is currently "my move", I shall
>> confirm that I am prepared to "smile" at the suggestion of kernel-lt
>> and kernel-ml. To begin with, I would need to perform a small
>> operation upon a copy of the kernel-ml specification file to create
>> that of kernel-lt. Perhaps others will now like to think things
>> through to completion.
> The only other modification I would see as needed  [ for almost any
> other package but kernels ] would be "Obsoletes: kernel-ml <3.0.45".
> But since kernels are parallel installable, I do not see anything else
> that needs to be done via the spec except for replacing the old
> Provides ( kernel-ml) with the new one.

I'd suggest kernel30 rather than kernel-lt since the long term in this
case is not that long and soon we'll be trying to work out how to change
kernel-lt-3.0-x to kernel-lt-3.8.x or whatever the next LTS kernel
happens to be.

Trevor