[elrepo] elrepo Digest, Vol 133, Issue 23

[Danie de Jager]

Hi,

Sorry for not posting this earlier.
# modinfo ena
filename:
/lib/modules/5.7.11-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena.ko
.license:        GPL
description:    Elastic Network Adapter (ENA)
author:         Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates
srcversion:     47734F16826853D6CEC56E5
alias:          pci:v00001D0Fd0000EC21sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001D0Fd0000EC20sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001D0Fd00001EC2sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias:          pci:v00001D0Fd00000EC2sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
depends:
retpoline:      Y
intree:         Y
name:           ena
*vermagic:       5.7.11-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 SMP mod_unload modversions *
parm:           debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 18:00, <elrepo-request at lists.elrepo.org> wrote:

> Send elrepo mailing list submissions to
>         elrepo at lists.elrepo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         elrepo-request at lists.elrepo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         elrepo-owner at lists.elrepo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of elrepo digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. ENA version not printing correctly (Danie de Jager)
>    2. Re: ENA version not printing correctly (Phil Perry)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:38:57 +0200
> From: Danie de Jager <danie.dejager at striata.com>
> To: EL Repo General Mailing List <elrepo at lists.elrepo.org>
> Subject: [elrepo] ENA version not printing correctly
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAC6Wms63seurHOyq2nWbOqPpVZVECz_TETfhygfArbhX+uCYGQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the version for ENA is the same as the kernel version rather
> than a known version like version: 2.0.3K. Is this done by design?
>
> # ethtool -i eth0
> driver: ena
> version: *5.7.11-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64*
> firmware-version:
> expansion-rom-version:
> bus-info: 0000:00:05.0
> supports-statistics: yes
> supports-test: no
> supports-eeprom-access: no
> supports-register-dump: no
> supports-priv-flags: no
>
> vs another system not using Elrepo
>
> # ethtool -i ens5
> driver: ena
> *version: 2.0.3K*
> firmware-version:
> expansion-rom-version:
> bus-info: 0000:00:05.0
> supports-statistics: yes
> supports-test: no
> supports-eeprom-access: no
> supports-register-dump: no
> supports-priv-flags: no
> *Danie de Jager* * ? * *Security Analyst* * ? * *Striata*
> *T.* *+27 011 5309600* * | * *www.striata.com
> <
> https://www.striata.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=striataEmailFooter&utm_campaign=daniede+jager
> >*
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/attachments/20200731/8c13bdb6/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:02:26 +0100
> From: Phil Perry <phil at elrepo.org>
> To: elrepo at lists.elrepo.org
> Subject: Re: [elrepo] ENA version not printing correctly
> Message-ID: <503a1bee-286b-cb93-a8de-1b206126f80e at elrepo.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 31/07/2020 08:38, Danie de Jager via elrepo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that the version for ENA is the same as the kernel?version
> > rather than a known version like version: 2.0.3K. Is this done by design?
> >
> > # ethtool -i eth0
> > driver: ena
> > version: *5.7.11-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64*
> > firmware-version:
> > expansion-rom-version:
> > bus-info: 0000:00:05.0
> > supports-statistics: yes
> > supports-test: no
> > supports-eeprom-access: no
> > supports-register-dump: no
> > supports-priv-flags: no
> >
> > vs another system not using Elrepo
> >
> > # ethtool -i ens5
> > driver: ena
> > *version: 2.0.3K*
> > firmware-version:
> > expansion-rom-version:
> > bus-info: 0000:00:05.0
> > supports-statistics: yes
> > supports-test: no
> > supports-eeprom-access: no
> > supports-register-dump: no
> > supports-priv-flags: no
> > *Danie de Jager* *?? * *Security Analyst* *?? * *Striata*
> > *T.* *+27 011 5309600* *?| * *www.striata.com
> > <
> https://www.striata.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=striataEmailFooter&utm_campaign=daniede+jager>*
>
> >
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> No it's not done by design, and am not sure why ethtool is picking up
> the kernel version instead of the module version.
>
> What version information does 'modinfo ena' show?
>
> Phil
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> elrepo mailing list
> elrepo at lists.elrepo.org
> http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo
>
>
> End of elrepo Digest, Vol 133, Issue 23
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/attachments/20200731/8db8af23/attachment-0001.html>